100% Private

Claude AI Models Compared: Opus 4.6, Sonnet & Haiku Guide

Anthropic offers three tiers of Claude models, each optimized for different use cases. This guide covers the latest lineup including the newly released Claude Opus 4.6, helping you choose the right model for coding, agents, writing, or analysis.

Updated February 2026: Now includes Claude Opus 4.6, released February 5, 2026, with 1M token context, adaptive thinking, and agent teams. Check Anthropic's documentation for the latest specifications. See also our Claude vs ChatGPT vs Gemini master comparison.

Quick Summary (TL;DR)

Don't have time to read everything? Here's what you need to know:

Opus 4.6 Best Quality

Best for: Complex coding, agents, research

Context: 200K / 1M (beta)

Output: 128K tokens

Cost: $5 / $25 per MTok

Sonnet 4.5 Best Value

Best for: Everyday tasks, coding, writing

Context: 200K / 1M (beta)

Output: 64K tokens

Cost: $3 / $15 per MTok

Haiku 4.5 Fastest

Best for: Chatbots, high volume, simple tasks

Context: 200K tokens

Output: 64K tokens

Cost: $1 / $5 per MTok

One-Line Recommendations
  • Building agentic workflows? → Use Opus 4.6
  • Building a production app? → Start with Sonnet 4.5
  • Need the absolute best output? → Use Opus 4.6
  • High-volume, simple tasks? → Use Haiku 4.5
  • Not sure? → Sonnet 4.5 is the safe default

Understanding the Model Tiers

Anthropic names their models after poetic forms, reflecting their approach to AI development. Each tier represents a different balance of capability, speed, and cost:

  • Opus (a major musical composition) — The most capable, for complex work
  • Sonnet (a 14-line poem) — Balanced and versatile
  • Haiku (a 3-line poem) — Concise and fast

Version History

Claude models have evolved rapidly through multiple generations:

GenerationReleasedKey Models
Claude 3Early 2024Opus 3, Sonnet 3, Haiku 3
Claude 3.5 – 3.7Mid 2024 – Feb 2025Sonnet 3.5, Sonnet 3.7
Claude 4May 2025Opus 4, Sonnet 4
Claude 4.1Aug 2025Opus 4.1
Claude 4.5Sep – Nov 2025Sonnet 4.5, Haiku 4.5, Opus 4.5
Claude 4.6Feb 2026Opus 4.6 (current flagship)

Current lineup (February 2026):
  • Claude Opus 4.6 (claude-opus-4-6)
  • Claude Sonnet 4.5 (claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929)
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 (claude-haiku-4-5-20251001)

Claude Opus 4.6 — The Powerhouse

Claude Opus 4.6, released February 5, 2026, is Anthropic's flagship model. It represents a major leap over Opus 4.5 with a 1M token context window, 128K output, adaptive thinking, and agent teams. It is designed for the most demanding tasks: complex reasoning, agentic coding, multi-step workflows, and comprehensive research.

What's New in Opus 4.6

  • 1M token context window (beta): Process ~750K words in a single request, up from 200K standard
  • 128K max output tokens: Double the previous 64K limit for long-form generation
  • Adaptive thinking: Model autonomously decides when to reason deeply, with configurable effort levels (low, medium, high, max)
  • Agent teams: Multiple agents coordinate in parallel, splitting complex tasks across specialized workers
  • Context compaction: Automatically summarizes older context during long-running agentic tasks

Opus 4.6

1M

context window (beta)


128K max output tokens

Benchmark Performance

  • Terminal-Bench 2.0: Highest score (agentic coding)
  • Humanity's Last Exam: Top performer (multidisciplinary reasoning)
  • BrowseComp: Best performance (information retrieval)
  • MRCR v2: 76% vs Opus 4.5's 18.5% (long-context retrieval)
  • GDPval-AA: Outperforms GPT-5.2 by ~144 Elo points

When to Use Opus 4.6

Good For
  • Agentic coding and multi-file refactoring
  • Architecture design decisions
  • Debugging complex, large codebases
  • Long-form content and research
  • Financial analysis and document review
  • Multi-step autonomous workflows
  • Tasks requiring 200K+ token context
Overkill For
  • Simple Q&A chatbots
  • Basic text formatting
  • High-volume, simple tasks
  • Real-time, latency-sensitive apps
  • Cost-sensitive projects

Adaptive Thinking vs Extended Thinking

Opus 4.6 introduces adaptive thinking, which differs from extended thinking available in all models:

  • Extended thinking: Available on all models. Always-on step-by-step reasoning before answering. You enable it explicitly in API calls.
  • Adaptive thinking (Opus 4.6 only): The model autonomously decides when and how much to reason. Set effort levels (low/medium/high/max) and the model allocates reasoning dynamically per task.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 — The Balanced Choice

Sonnet 4.5 hits the sweet spot between capability and efficiency. It handles most professional tasks well while being faster and more affordable than Opus. It also now supports the 1M token context window in beta.

Key Strengths

  • Best value: Near-Opus quality at 60% lower cost
  • Speed: Significantly faster than Opus for most tasks
  • 1M context (beta): Same long-context support as Opus 4.6
  • 64K output: Generous output limit for most use cases
  • Coding: Excellent for day-to-day development work
  • Versatility: Handles diverse tasks without switching models

Sonnet 4.5

200K

context (1M beta)


64K max output tokens

When to Use Sonnet 4.5

Perfect For
  • Code generation and debugging
  • Content writing and editing
  • Data analysis and summarization
  • Customer support automation
  • API-powered applications
  • Interactive assistants
Consider Alternatives
  • Ultra-complex research → Opus 4.6
  • Agentic workflows → Opus 4.6
  • Simple classification → Haiku
  • Real-time chat → Haiku
  • Massive scale → Haiku

Claude Haiku 4.5 — Speed Champion

Haiku is optimized for speed and efficiency. It delivers near-instant responses at the lowest cost, making it ideal for high-volume applications and real-time interactions. Despite being the smallest model, Haiku 4.5 offers near-frontier intelligence.

Key Strengths

  • Speed: Near-instant responses, often under 1 second
  • Cost: 3x cheaper than Sonnet, 5x cheaper than Opus
  • 64K output: Same output limit as Sonnet 4.5
  • Scale: Handle millions of requests affordably
  • Extended thinking: Full support for step-by-step reasoning

Haiku 4.5

200K

context window


64K max output tokens

When to Use Haiku 4.5

Ideal For
  • Chatbots and virtual assistants
  • Content moderation
  • Text classification
  • Quick summaries
  • Data extraction
  • Auto-complete suggestions
  • High-volume API calls
Not Recommended For
  • Complex multi-step reasoning
  • Long-form content creation
  • Nuanced analysis
  • Advanced agentic tasks
  • Research synthesis

Detailed Comparison Table

FeatureOpus 4.6Sonnet 4.5Haiku 4.5
API Model IDclaude-opus-4-6claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Context Window200K / 1M (beta)200K / 1M (beta)200K tokens
Max Output128K tokens64K tokens64K tokens
Input Price$5 / MTok$3 / MTok$1 / MTok
Output Price$25 / MTok$15 / MTok$5 / MTok
SpeedModerateFastFastest
Vision (images)YesYesYes
Extended ThinkingYesYesYes
Adaptive ThinkingYesNoNo
Agent TeamsYes (preview)NoNo
Knowledge CutoffMay 2025Jan 2025Feb 2025
Best ForComplex analysis, agentsMost use casesHigh-volume apps

Quality Comparison (Simplified)

Coding
Opus
98%
Sonnet
92%
Haiku
75%
Reasoning
Opus
97%
Sonnet
88%
Haiku
70%
Speed
Opus
40%
Sonnet
70%
Haiku
98%

Which Model for Your Use Case?

  • Agentic coding (multi-file, autonomous): Opus 4.6
  • Code generation (new features): Sonnet 4.5
  • Complex debugging: Opus 4.6
  • Code review: Sonnet 4.5
  • Refactoring large codebases: Opus 4.6
  • Auto-complete/suggestions: Haiku 4.5
  • Documentation generation: Sonnet 4.5
  • Architecture planning: Opus 4.6

  • Blog posts and articles: Sonnet 4.5
  • Marketing copy: Sonnet 4.5
  • Technical documentation: Sonnet 4.5 or Opus 4.6
  • Creative writing: Opus 4.6
  • Email drafts: Haiku 4.5 or Sonnet 4.5
  • Social media posts: Haiku 4.5
  • Translation: Sonnet 4.5

  • Customer support chatbot: Haiku 4.5
  • Financial analysis: Opus 4.6
  • Data analysis: Sonnet 4.5 or Opus 4.6
  • Report generation: Sonnet 4.5
  • Meeting summaries: Sonnet 4.5
  • Contract review: Opus 4.6
  • Market research: Opus 4.6
  • Lead qualification: Haiku 4.5

  • Multi-step autonomous workflows: Opus 4.6
  • Agent teams (parallel workers): Opus 4.6
  • Tool use (API calls, file ops): Opus 4.6 or Sonnet 4.5
  • Simple single-step agents: Sonnet 4.5
  • Routing and classification: Haiku 4.5
  • Monitoring and alerts: Haiku 4.5

Pricing Breakdown

Claude models use token-based pricing. A token is roughly 4 characters or ¾ of a word.

ModelInput (per 1M tokens)Output (per 1M tokens)Batch API (50% off)
Opus 4.6$5.00$25.00$2.50 / $12.50
Sonnet 4.5$3.00$15.00$1.50 / $7.50
Haiku 4.5$1.00$5.00$0.50 / $2.50

Prompt Caching

Anthropic offers prompt caching to reduce costs for repeated context like system prompts:

  • 5-minute cache write: 1.25x base input price
  • 1-hour cache write: 2x base input price
  • Cache read: 0.1x base input price (up to 90% savings)

Cost Optimization Tips

  • Use model routing: Send simple queries to Haiku, complex ones to Sonnet/Opus
  • Use Batch API: 50% off for non-time-sensitive workloads
  • Cache system prompts: Up to 90% savings on repeated context
  • Optimize prompts: Shorter, clearer prompts reduce token usage
  • Start with Haiku: Test if it meets your quality needs before upgrading

Price context: Opus 4.6 at $5/$25 is 67% cheaper than the earlier Opus 4.1 ($15/$75) while being significantly more capable.

API Usage Tips

Model IDs

Use these identifiers when calling the Anthropic API:

# Current models
Opus 4.6:   claude-opus-4-6
Sonnet 4.5: claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929
Haiku 4.5:  claude-haiku-4-5-20251001

# Aliases (always point to latest) claude-sonnet-4-5 claude-haiku-4-5

Basic API Call (Python)

import anthropic

client = anthropic.Anthropic()

# Using Sonnet 4.5 (recommended default) message = client.messages.create( model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", max_tokens=1024, messages=[ {"role": "user", "content": "Explain quantum computing"} ] )

print(message.content[0].text)

Using Adaptive Thinking (Opus 4.6)

# Opus 4.6 adaptive thinking with effort control
message = client.messages.create(
model="claude-opus-4-6",
max_tokens=16384,
thinking={
"type": "enabled",
"budget_tokens": 10000
},
messages=[
{"role": "user", "content": "Analyze this codebase architecture..."}
]
)

Model Routing Pattern

def choose_model(task_complexity: str) -> str:
"""Select model based on task complexity."""
models = {
"simple": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001",      # Fast, cheap
"moderate": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",    # Balanced
"complex": "claude-opus-4-6",                # Best quality
"agentic": "claude-opus-4-6"                 # Multi-step agents
}
return models.get(task_complexity, models["moderate"])

1M Context Window (Beta)

# Enable 1M token context for Opus 4.6 or Sonnet 4.5
message = client.messages.create(
model="claude-opus-4-6",
max_tokens=8192,
betas=["context-1m-2025-08-07"],
messages=[
{"role": "user", "content": very_long_document + "\n\nSummarize this."}
]
)

Frequently Asked Questions

Sonnet 4.5 is the best starting point for most users. It offers an excellent balance of quality, speed, and cost. Upgrade to Opus 4.6 for complex agentic tasks or deep analysis, or use Haiku 4.5 for high-volume, latency-sensitive applications.

Opus 4.6 adds: 1M token context window (beta), 128K output tokens (up from 64K), adaptive thinking with configurable effort levels, agent teams for parallel task coordination, context compaction for long sessions, and major improvements in long-context retrieval (76% vs 18.5% on MRCR v2). Price remains the same at $5/$25 per million tokens.

Yes, this is called "model routing" and is a best practice. Route simple tasks (greetings, classification) to Haiku for speed and cost savings, standard work to Sonnet, and complex analysis or agentic workflows to Opus. This optimizes both cost and quality.

Not always. For many tasks, Sonnet 4.5 produces equivalent results faster and cheaper. Opus 4.6 shines specifically on complex multi-step reasoning, very long documents (200K+ tokens), agentic workflows, and tasks requiring adaptive thinking. For straightforward coding, writing, or analysis, Sonnet often performs just as well.

Agent teams, available as a research preview in Claude Code, allow Opus 4.6 to split complex tasks into smaller jobs that run in parallel. Each agent works on its segment and coordinates with others. For example, a large codebase refactoring might spawn separate agents for each module, which complete their work independently and merge results.

Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.5 support a 1 million token context window in beta, equivalent to roughly 750,000 words or 3,000 pages. Enable it by including the context-1m-2025-08-07 beta header in API requests. Long context pricing applies to requests exceeding 200K tokens. Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens only.

Legacy Models

Previous Claude models are still available but Anthropic recommends migrating to current models:

ModelAPI IDPricingStatus
Opus 4.5claude-opus-4-5-20251101$5 / $25Available (legacy)
Opus 4.1claude-opus-4-1-20250805$15 / $75Available (legacy)
Sonnet 4claude-sonnet-4-20250514$3 / $15Available (legacy)
Opus 4claude-opus-4-20250514$15 / $75Available (legacy)
Sonnet 3.7claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219$3 / $15Available (legacy)
Haiku 3claude-3-haiku-20240307$0.25 / $1.25Available (legacy)

Conclusion

Choosing the right Claude model depends on your specific needs:

  • Default choice: Start with Sonnet 4.5 — it handles 90% of use cases well
  • Agentic and complex work: Upgrade to Opus 4.6 for multi-step workflows, deep analysis, or large codebases
  • High volume: Use Haiku 4.5 for chatbots, classification, or cost-sensitive applications

With Opus 4.6, Anthropic has pushed the frontier on agentic capabilities and long-context processing while keeping pricing accessible. The 1M token context window and agent teams open up entirely new use cases that were previously impractical.

Additional Resources

Privacy Notice: This site works entirely in your browser. We don't collect or store your data. Optional analytics help us improve the site. You can deny without affecting functionality.